An African American perspective answers two major questions about Gaza
www.IsraelpalestineDialogue.com URL – http://israel-palestine-dialogue.blogspot.com/2014/08/african-american-perspective-on-gaza.html
I am up at 3:00 AM, a piece by Ali Rizvi in Huffington Post was haunting me since yesterday, I had to find the answers for two of his questions, “If Israel withdrew from the occupied territories tomorrow, all in one go — andwent back to the 1967 borders — and gave the Palestinians East Jerusalem — do you honestly think Hamas wouldn’t find something else to pick a fight about? “ The answer is no, and I am writing a full piece on dealing with Hamas.
The second question comes from this, “But Gaza makes Muslims around the world, both Sunni and Shia, speak up in a way they never do otherwise (700 deaths). Bashar al-Assad has killed over 180,000 Syrians, mostly Muslim, in two years — more than the number killed in Palestine in two decades. Thousands of Muslims in Iraq and Syria have been killed by ISIS in the last two months. Tens of thousands have been killed by the Taliban. Half a million black Muslims were killed by Arab Muslims in Sudan. The list goes on.”
The above statement is a fodder to the ones on Netanyahu’s side (Jews and Judaism are on the right path and standing up for righteousness), and eager to shout: Anti-Semitism.
Why do Muslims in general get riled up against Israel? The answer is in the following quotes by Britney Cooper in Salon. The article follows my commentary.
“Israel’s origin story has had deep and profound meaning for African-Americans and our ongoing freedom struggle. And conservative evangelical preachers generally don’t invite their congregants to consider how the Israelites’ ethnic cleansing of the Canaanites squares with our moral outrage against the murder of innocent people. “
“In prior centuries, European powers constructed ideas of a savage Indigenous other and a benighted animalistic African other to justify the plunder and enslavement of the places where these people lived. Indigenous people and West Africans were not a threat, except if their land was what you wanted.”
“Coming from a people who have had religious texts used to justify the slaughter and oppression of my people, I cannot abide the use of religiously grounded identities to justify the mistreatment of another group of people.”
Muslims have done the same thing, they have mistreated the minorities, not to this extent, but shamefully they have. This is what makes me believe that it is not religion, as it is the case with tyrants in every religion. Which religious group that had the power or majority has not done it?
And finally this, “Still, black people know what it means to live under the shadow of limited resources, constant surveillance, random acts of state-based violence that go unpunished, and fear of violence from people who look like you, because those people have become the most severe victims of systematic privation and the desperation and nihilism and, yes, violence, it breeds.”
I was thinking – a majority of the world, well let me say, the absolute majority of world, that is 97% of nations of the world have opposed Israeli siege, occupation and the settlers, the United Nations has passed many resolutions to this effect, which were all violated. There is anger in the world, because they cannot do anything when the United States is blatantly supporting Israel to continue doing what it is doing; violations of UN resolutions and human rights. This anger is expressed in demonstrations against the powerful bullies, because that is about what they can do.
This phenomenon also answers why Muslims around the world are rallying up for Palestinians. Even if they live in Muslim majority nations, they experience oppression and harassment by the dictators, religious police and monarchs, and see themselves in the mirror of Palestinians. Like the African Americans with, “unchecked policing, nonexistent economic opportunity, mass incarceration.” The Muslims around the world relate with this and empathize with the Palestinians. And this is the same reason the entire world besides Muslims are demonstrating and protesting against. It is not against Jews, Judaism or Israel, but it is against the apartheid mindset,” you are inferior and your life has no meaning to me and I can kill you like dogs (the colonialist in Australia have actually said this).”
Netanyahu and the right-wing leaders of Israel and the sheepish Senators who unanimously encouraged Israel to continue to pound with justifications and more funding are responsible for the deaths of Civilians on both sides of the divide. They should have made these rascals sit down and talk, and not leave until they agree, instead of blowing money on more weapons but continued insecurities and injustices. Barack Obama was a big hope for the world, all the powerless and the minorities of the world cried with joy on November 4, 2008, he was a hope for the minority, the weak and the powerless. What a disappointment he is! He could not stand up for the powerless and for the human rights. Shame on him! You blame the woman who is raped instead of the rapist? All these men must be held responsible for the rise in Antisemitism and have weakened the security of Israel further.
These men have devalued America in the eyes of the people, and it is not too late to fix it, not sure what can be done, but we have to do something. Any ideas besides suing these men?
Salon Article, “I was wrong about Gaza: Why we can no longer ignore the horrors in Palestine” by Brittney Cooper at Salon.com
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Mike Ghouse is a public speaker, thinker, writer and a commentator on Pluralism at work place, politics, religion, society, gender, race, culture, ethnicity, food and foreign policy. All about him is listed in several links at www.MikeGhouse.netand his writings are at www.TheGhousediary.comand 10 other blogs. He is committed to building cohesive societies and offers pluralistic solutions on issues of the day.
# # #
I was wrong about Gaza: Why we can no longer ignore the horrors in Palestine
I tried to limit my exposure to the bombings and screams. But here’s why being black in America made me think twice http://www.salon.com/2014/08/05/i_was_wrong_about_gaza_why_we_can_no_longer_ignore_the_horrors_in_palestine/
I commenced this turning off of horrors after being bombarded this summer with story after story of police brutality in the U.S. – of a California Highway Patrolman pummeling 51-year-old Marlene Pinnock in the face for walking on the shoulder of a Los Angeles freeway; of the NYPD choking Eric Garner to death; of Brooklyn police officers putting another pregnant woman in a chokehold, and dragging a naked grandmother out of her home; of Renisha McBride’s character being placed on trial beside that of her killer, Theodore Wafer.
It sometimes feels too much to bear. To be black in America, even when you are rich, is to live in constant awareness that you have little protection against violence, either from desperate people in your own neighborhoods or from police who see you as a body to protect themselves from rather than a citizen worthy of protection.
What does any of this have to do with the struggles of Palestinians in Gaza?
Everything. First, we have a black president, who is commander in chief of a pro-Israel state. And black people are generally not into publicly and vocally criticizing Barack Obama, despite plenty of privately whispered reservations around kitchen tables and in barber shops and beauty shops. Second, African-Americans are disproportionately evangelical Christians, and evangelical Christianity, with its love of the story of Moses leading the Israelites (almost) to the Promised Land, is rooted in a kind of conservative theology that justifies a pro-Israel position. When President Obama was elected to office, many considered him to be the progenitor of the new “Joshua Generation,” who having thrown off the Mosaic tropes of older models of black leadership, which characterized everyone from Harriet Tubman to MLK, was now poised to actually lead the nation into the “promised land.”
Israel’s origin story has had deep and profound meaning for African-Americans and our ongoing freedom struggle. And conservative evangelical preachers generally don’t invite their congregants to consider how the Israelites’ ethnic cleansing of the Canaanites squares with our moral outrage against the murder of innocent people. That’s not especially surprising in white evangelical churches, given how bound up white evangelicalism is with the Western colonial project. But it always gives me pause in black churches, when preachers (my own pastor being an exception, thankfully) take this text as the subject of a sermon, with no sense of irony.
I place the term “terrorist” in scare quotes not because the violence and terror that Palestinians and some Israelis are enduring isn’t real but rather because the social construction of the “terrorist” performs important political work in justifying our political interests. In prior centuries, European powers constructed ideas of a savage Indigenous other and a benighted animalistic African other to justify the plunder and enslavement of the places where these people lived. Indigenous people and West Africans were not a threat, except if their land was what you wanted.
Sept. 11, 2001, became a significant touch point in a much longer U.S. project of constructing the “terrorist” as an identity that justifies escalating levels of state-based violence that kills far more civilians than armed militants. Given this long history of creating enemies that justify our political aims, while claiming that the enemies themselves necessitated the political aims, we should be suspicious of these constructions.
We can be suspicious of the construction of the terrorist as a political figure and still condemn the violence committed by militant extremist groups like Hamas. We can be suspicious of the myth of the black male criminal, which drives so much of social policy in the U.S., and still decry and disavow violent criminal activity that devastates communities. We can be suspicious of the practices of surveillance and policing that constrict the lives of African-Americans, Latinos and Arab Americans in the U.S. and still call the police when we are in danger.
What I am advocating is for us not to do as I did when the first pictures of this latest round of violence filtered out of Palestine. We cannot close our eyes and make the devastation and injustice go away. We have to look clearly. We have to begin to think about the processes that breed militancy and resistance.
Coming from a people who have had religious texts used to justify the slaughter and oppression of my people, I cannot abide the use of religiously grounded identities to justify the mistreatment of another group of people. Like the members of Jewish Voice for Peace, I believe that I can retain my religious identifications and reject some of the politics that go along with them.
So though I am Christian, I choose to approach my engagements with the Bible with what liberation and womanist theologians call a “hermeneutic of suspicion.” I invite others with similar histories and identifications to do the same.
Having come from people who have risen up, rioted and rebelled against oppressive state forces that confined us to land, restricted our movement and denied our humanity, I resist the urge to characterize all forms of resistance as terror. Especially, if we will not first be honest about the colonization and apartheid that fomented these acts of rebellion.
I recognize that what begins as resistance can devolve into terror, particularly the terrorizing of women and children, and this is especially true of nationalist movements. In this regard, Hamas deserves our strict and sure scrutiny.
On this score, I agree with Morehouse professor Marc Lamont Hill, who said that we must begin “not from the place of Palestinian resistance, but from the place of Israeli occupation.” Like him, I’m not pro-Hamas, but rather anti-occupation. Moreover, I know that our advocacy for Palestine will not necessarily improve the conditions of black Palestinians who live there under the shadow of racism.
Still, black people know what it means to live under the shadow of limited resources, constant surveillance, random acts of state-based violence that go unpunished, and fear of violence from people who look like you, because those people have become the most severe victims of systematic privation and the desperation and nihilism and, yes, violence, it breeds.
The same kind of nuance, the same hermeneutic of suspicion, the same ethic of care, that frames our understanding of black suffering and violence – unchecked policing, nonexistent economic opportunity, mass incarceration — in this political moment in the U.S. should frame our understanding of Gaza’s relationship to Israel. America’s sordid history of settler colonialism, slavery, mass incarceration and other racially driven social ills teaches us a lot about why our country identifies with Israel and it teaches us everything we need to know about why we shouldn’t.
Brittney Cooper is a contributing writer at Salon, and teaches Women’s and Gender Studies and Africana Studies at Rutgers. Follow her on Twitter at @professorcrunk.